1. A

    1. M. Ament, S. Frey, F. Sadlo, T. Ertl, and D. Weiskopf, “GPU-based 2D Flow Simulation Steering using Coherent Structures,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, Grid and Cloud Computing for Engineering, 2011.
  2. B

    1. M. Bader, K. Rahnema, and C. Vigh, “Memory-efficient Sierpinski-order traversals on dynamically adaptive, recursivly structured triangular grids,” Para 2010 - State of the Art in Scientific and Parallel Computing, vol. 0, pp. 302--312, 2011.
    2. V. Ballenegger, J. J. Cerda, and C. Holm, “Removal of spurious self-interactions in particle-mesh methods,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 9, pp. 1919--1923, 2011.
    3. A. Barth, C. Schwab, and N. Zollinger, “Multi-level Monte Carlo finite element method for elliptic PDEs  with stochastic coefficients,” Numer. Math., vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 123--161, 2011.
    4. A. Barth, F. E. Benth, and J. Potthoff, “Hedging of spatial temperature risk with market-traded futures,” Appl. Math. Finance, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 93--117, 2011.
    5. R. Bauer, E. A. Jägle, W. Baumann, and E. J. Mittemeijer, “Kinetics of the allotropic hcp-fcc phase transformation in cobalt,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 437--457, 2011.
    6. C. Bradley et al., “OpenCMISS: A multi-physics & multi-scale computational infrastructure for the VPH/Physiome project,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 0, 2011.
    7. S. Brdar, A. Dedner, and R. Klöfkorn, “Compact and Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods with Application  to Atmospheric Flows,” in Computational Methods in Science and Engineering: Proceedings of  the Workshop SimLabs@KIT, I. K. et al., Ed. KIT Scientific Publishing, 2011, pp. 109–116.
    8. S. Brdar, A. Dedner, R. Klöfkorn, M. Kränkel, and D. Kröner, “Simulation of Geophysical Problems with DUNE-FEM,” in Computational Science and High Performance Computing IV, vol. 115, E. K. et al., Ed. Springer, 2011, pp. 93–106.
    9. C. Breindl, D. Schittler, S. Waldherr, and F. Allgöwer, “Structural requirements and discrimination of cell differentiation networks,” IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, vol. 0, pp. 11767--11772, 2011.
    10. C. Böhm, S. Yu, and F. Allgöwer, “Moving Horizon H-Infinity Control of Constrained Periodically Time-Varying Systems,” Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 10156--10161, 2011.
    11. R. Bürger, I. Kröker, and C. Rohde, “Uncertainty Quantification for a Clarifier-Thickener Model with Random Feed,” Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI - Problems & Perspectives, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 195--203, 2011.
    12. R. B�rger, I. Kr�ker, and C. Rohde, “Uncertainty quantification for a clarifier-thickener model with random  feed,” in Finite volumes for complex applications. VI. Problems & perspectives.  Volume 1, 2, vol. 4, Springer, 2011, pp. 195--203.
  3. C

    1. J. J. Cerda, V. Ballenegger, and C. Holm, “Particle-particle particle-mesh method for dipolar interactions: tOn error estimates and efficiency of schemes with analytical differentiation tand mesh interlacing,” J. Chem . Phys., vol. 135, p. 184110, 2011.
    2. O. A. Cirpka, F. P. J. de Barros, G. Chiogna, M. Rolle, and W. Nowak, “Stochastic Flux-Related Analysis of Transverse Mixing in Two-Dimensional Heterogeneous Porous Media,” Water Resources Reseach, vol. 47, p. W06515, 2011.
    3. O. A. Cirpka, F. P. J. de Barros, G. Chiogna, and W. Nowak, “Probability Density Function of Steady-State Concentration in Two-Dimensional Heterogeneous Porous Media,” Water Resources Research, vol. 47, p. W11523, 2011.
  4. D

    1. A. Dadalau, K. Groh, M. Reuß, and A. Verl, “Modeling linear guide systems with CoFEM - Equivalent models for rolling contact,” Production Engineering Research and Development, vol. 0, 2011.
    2. M. Darcis, H. Class, B. Flemisch, and R. Helmig, “Sequential Model Coupling for Feasibility Studies of CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers,” Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, vol. 66, pp. 93--103, 2011.
    3. A. Dedner et al., “On the computation of slow manifolds in chemical kinetics via optimization  and their use as reduced models in reactive flow systems.,” 2011.
    4. A. Dedner and R. Klöfkorn, “A Generic Stabilization Approach for Higher Order Discontinuous  Galerkin Methods for Convection Dominated Problems,” J. Sci. Comput., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 365–388, 2011.
    5. M. Dihlmann, M. Drohmann, and B. Haasdonk, “Model Reduction of Parametrized Evolution Problems using the Reduced  basis Method with Adaptive Time-Partitioning,” in Proc. of ADMOS 2011, 2011.
    6. M. Drohmann, B. Haasdonk, and M. Ohlberger, “Adaptive Reduced Basis Methods for Nonlinear Convection-Diffusion  Equations,” in In Proc. FVCA6, 2011.
    7. T. Döring, D. Kern, P. Marshall, M. Pfeiffer, J. Schöning, and A. Schmidt, “Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand,” Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, vol. 0, pp. 483--492, 2011.
  5. E

    1. P. Eberhard and N. Wengert, “Using Multibody Systems for the Investigation of Dynamic Aberrations in High Precision Optics,” PAMM - Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 41--42, 2011.
    2. C. Eck and M. Kutter, “On the solvability of a two scale model for liquid phase epitaxy  with elasticity,” Bericht 2011/001 des Instituts f�r Angewandte Analysis und Numerische  Simulation der Universität Stuttgart, 2011.
    3. W. Ehlers and O. Avci, “Stress-dependent hardening and failure surfaces of dry sand,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 0, 2011.
    4. W. Ehlers, O. Avci, and B. Markert, “Computation of slope movements initiated by rain-induced shear bands in small-scale tests and in situ,” Vadose Zone Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 512--525, 2011.
    5. W. Ehlers, “Recovering Micropolar Continua from Particle Mechanics by Use of Homogenisation Strategies,” Recent Developments and Innovative Applications in Computational Mechanics, pp. 179--190, 2011.
    6. W. Ehlers and O. Avci, “Experimental and Computational Issues in the Mechanics of Multi-Physical Unsaturated Soil,” Multiscale and Multiphysics Processes in Geomechanics, pp. 125--128, 2011.
    7. C. Ergenzinger, R. Seifried, and P. Eberhard, “A discrete element model to describe failure of strong rock in uniaxial compression,” Granular Matter, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 341--364, 2011.
    8. R. Eymard, G. Henry, R. Herbin, F. Hubert, R. Klöfkorn, and G. Manzini, “3D Benchmark on Discretization Schemes for Anisotropic Diffusion  Problems on General Grids,” in Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI Problems & Perspectives, vol. 4, J. Fort, J. Fürst, J. Halama, R. Herbin, and F. Hubert, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 895–930.
  6. F

    1. M. Falk, M. Daub, G. Schneider, and T. Ertl, “Modeling and Visualization of Receptor Clustering on the Cellular Membrane,” IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (BioVis 2011), pp. 9--15, 2011.
    2. C. Fehling, F. Leymann, R. Retter, D. Schumm, and W. Schupeck, “An Architectural Pattern Language of Cloud-based Applications,” Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLoP 2011, 2011.
    3. C. Fehling, R. Konrad, F. Leymann, R. Mietzner, M. Pauly, and D. Schumm, “Flexible Process-based Applications in Hybrid Clouds,” Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD 2011), 2011.
    4. J. Fehr and P. Eberhard, “Simulation Process of Flexible Multibody Systems with Non-modal Model Order Reduction Techniques,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 313--334, 2011.
    5. A. Ferrari, C.-D. Munz, and B. Weigand, “A High Order Sharp Interface Method with Local Time Stepping for Compressible Multiphase Flows,” Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205--230, 2011.
    6. A. Fischer and P. Eberhard, “Simulation-based Stability Analysis of a Thin-Walled Cylinder during Turning with Improvements using an Adaptronic Turning Chisel,” Archive of Mechanical Engineering, vol. LVIII, pp. 367--391, 2011.
    7. S. Frey and T. Ertl, “Load Balancing Utilizing Data Redundancy in Distributed Volume Rendering,” Eurographics Symposium on Parallel Graphics and Visualization (EGPGV11), vol. 0, 2011.
    8. J. Fritz, B. Flemisch, and R. Helmig, “Decoupled and multiphysics models for non-isothermal compositional two-phases flow in porous media,” International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, vol. 9, pp. 17--28, 2011.
  7. G

    1. M. Geveler, D. Ribbrock, D. Göddeke, P. Zajac, and S. Turek, “Towards a complete FEM-based simulation toolkit on GPUs: Geometric  multigrid solvers,” in 23rd International Conference on Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics  (ParCFD’11), 2011.
    2. M. Geveler, D. Ribbrock, S. Mallach, D. Göddeke, and S. Turek, “A Simulation Suite for Lattice-Boltzmann based Real-Time CFD  Applications Exploiting Multi-Level Parallelism on modern Multi-  and Many-Core Architectures,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 2, pp. 113--123, 2011.
    3. M. Geveler, D. Ribbrock, D. Göddeke, P. Zajac, and S. Turek, “Efficient Finite Element Geometric Multigrid Solvers for Unstructured  Grids on GPUs,” in Second International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, Grid and  Cloud Computing for Engineering, 2011.
    4. J. Giesselmann and M. Wiebe, “Finite volume schemes for balance laws on time-dependent surfaces,” Proceedings Book of, 2011.
    5. J. Giesselmann, “Modelling and Analysis for Curvature Driven Partial Differential  Equations,” PhD dissertation, Universit�t Stuttgart, 2011.
    6. T. Gorius, R. Seifried, and P. Eberhard, “Comparing exact inversion and singular perturbation approaches for a serial flexible manipulator,” PAMM, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45--46, 2011.
    7. T. Gorius, R. Seifried, and P. Eberhard, “Regelung des EXPO-Pendels,” at - Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 299--307, 2011.
    8. N. Gribova, A. Arnold, T. Schilling, and C. Holm, “How close to two dimensions does a Lennard-Jones system need to be to produce a hexatic phase?,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 135, no. 5, p. 054514, 2011.
    9. M. Gugat, M. Herty, and V. Schleper, “Flow control in gas networks: exact controllability to a given demand,” Math. Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 745--757, 2011.
    10. D. Göddeke and R. Strzodka, “Cyclic Reduction Tridiagonal Solvers on GPUs Applied to Mixed Precision  Multigrid,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22--32, 2011.
    11. K. Görlach, M. Sonntag, D. Karastoyanova, F. Leymann, and M. Reiter, “Conventional Workflow Technology for Scientific Simulation,” Guide to e-Science, vol. 0, 2011.
  8. H

    1. B. Haasdonk, J. Salomon, and B. Wohlmuth, “A Reduced Basis Method for Parametrized Variational Inequalities,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 0, 2011.
    2. B. Haasdonk, M. Dihlmann, and M. Ohlberger, “A Training Set and Multiple Basis Generation Approach for Parametrized  Model Reduction Based on Adaptive Grids in Parameter Space,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, vol. 17, pp. 423--442, 2011.
    3. B. Haasdonk, “Reduzierte-Basis-Methoden, Vorlesungsskript SS 2011,” University of Stuttgart, 2011–004, 2011.
    4. B. Haasdonk and B. Lohmann, “Special Issue on ‘“Model Order Reduction of Parametrized Problems,”’” Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 295--296, 2011.
    5. B. Haasdonk and M. Ohlberger, “Efficient reduced models and a posteriori error estimation  for parametrized dynamical systems by offline/online decomposition,” Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 145--161, 2011.
    6. H. Harbrecht and C. Schwab, “Sparse tensor finite elements for elliptic multiple scale problems,” CMAME, vol. 200, pp. 3100--3110, 2011.
    7. H. Harbrecht and M. Randrianarivony, “Wavelet BEM on molecular surfaces: solvent excluded surfaces,” Computing, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 335--364, 2011.
    8. J. Hasenauer, S. Waldherr, M. Doszczak, P. Scheurich, N. Radde, and F. Allgöwer, “Analysis of heterogeneous cell populations: A density-based modeling and identification framework,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1417--1425, 2011.
    9. J. Hasenauer, J. Heinrich, M. Doszczak, P. Scheurich, D. Weiskopf, and F. Allgöwer, “Visualization methods and support vector machines as tools for determining markers in models of heterogeneous populations: Proapoptotic signaling as a case study,” In Proc. of 8th Workshop for Computational Systems Biology (WCSB 2011), Zürich, Switzerland, vol. 0, pp. 61--64, 2011.
    10. Y. Heider, B. Markert, and W. Ehlers, “Dynamic Wave Propagation in Infinite Saturated Porous Media Half Spaces,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 0, 2011.
    11. J. Heinrich, M. Burch, R. Seifert, and D. Weiskopf, “BiCluster Viewer: A Visualization Tool for Analyzing Gene Expression Data,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 0, 2011.
    12. J. Heinrich, S. Bachthaler, and D. Weiskopf, “Progressive Splatting of Continuous Scatterplots and Parallel Coordinates,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 653--662, 2011.
    13. A. A. Hemmat, A. Rivaz, and H. Minbashian, “Construction of Biorthogonal Wavelets by the Aid of the Perfect Reconstruction  FIR Filters,” in Proceedings of the 19th Seminar on Mathematical Analysis and Its  Applications, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran, 2011.
    14. M. Herty and V. Schleper, “Time discretization methods for hyperbolic optimization problems with relaxation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 183--194, 2011.
    15. M. Herty and V. Schleper, “Traffic flow with unobservant drivers,” ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech., vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 763--776, 2011.
    16. M. Herty and V. Schleper, “Time discretizations for numerical optimisation of hyperbolic problems,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 183--194, 2011.
    17. O. A. Hickey, C. Holm, J. L. Harden, and G. W. Slater, “Influence of charged polymer coatings on electro-osmotic flow: molecular dynamics simulations,” Macromolecules, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 9455--9463, 2011.
    18. M. Hlawatsch, F. Sadlo, and D. Weiskopf, “Hierarchical Line Integration,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1148--1163, 2011.
    19. S. Hoher, P. Schindler, S. Göttlich, V. Schleper, and S. Röck, System Dynamic Models and Real-time Simulation  of Complex Material Flow Systems, vol. 0. Springer, 2011.
    20. K. Häberle and W. Ehlers, “Carbon dioxide storage in the subsurface: an approach including solid deformations and phase transition,” Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 476--474, 2011.
  9. I

    1. M. Iwamura, P. Eberhard, W. Schiehlen, and R. Seifried, “A General Purpose Algorithm for Optimal Trajectory Planning of Closed Loop Multibody Systems,” Multibody Dynamics, vol. 23, pp. 173--193, 2011.
  10. J

    1. E. A. Jaegle and E. J. Mittemeijer, “The Kinetics of and the Microstructure Induced by the Recrystallization of Copper,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 2011.
    2. E. A. Jaegle and E. J. Mittemeijer, “Simulation of the Kinetics of Grain-Boundary Nucleated Phase Transformations,” Solid State Phenom, vol. 172, pp. 1128--133, 2011.
    3. E. A. Jaegle and E. J. Mittemeijer, “The kinetics of grain-boundary nucleated phase transformations: Simulations and modelling,” Acta Materialia, vol. 59, pp. 5775--5786, 2011.
    4. N. Jung, A. T. Patera, B. Haasdonk, and B. Lohmann, “Model Order Reduction and Error Estimation with an Application to  the Parameter-Dependent Eddy Current Equation,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 561--582, 2011.
    5. E. A. Jägle and E. J. Mittemeijer, “Kinetics of interface-controlled phase transformations: atomistic and mesoscopic simulations,” Kinetics of interface-controlled phase transformations: atomistic and mesoscopic simulations. International Journal of Materials Research, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 837--845, 2011.
  11. K

    1. B. Kabil, “On the asymptotics of solutions to resonator equations,” Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, vol. 8, pp. 373–380, 2011.
    2. B. Kaltenbacher and J. Offtermatt, “A Refinement and Coarsening Indicator Algorithm for Finding Sparse Solutions of Inverse Problems,” Inverse Problems and Imaging, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 391--406, 2011.
    3. S. Kantorovich, R. Weeber, J. J. Cerda, and C. Holm, “Ferrofluids with shifted dipoles: ground state structures,” Soft Matter, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 5217--5227, 2011.
    4. N. Karajan, W. Ehlers, O. Röhrle, and S. Schmitt, “Homogenisation method to capture the non-linear behaviour of intervertebral discs in multi-body systems,” Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 11, pp. 95--96, 2011.
    5. N. Karajan, O. Röhrle, W. Ehlers, and S. Schmitt, “Linking Continuous and Discrete Intervertebral Disc Models through Homogenisation,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2011.
    6. S. Kaulmann, M. Ohlberger, and B. Haasdonk, “A new local reduced basis discontinuous Galerkin approach for heterogeneous  multiscale problems,” Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 349, no. 23–24, pp. 1233--1238, 2011.
    7. S. Kaulmann, “A Localized Reduced Basis Approach for Heterogenous Multiscale Problems,” Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster, Einsteinstrasse 62, 48149 Münster, 2011.
    8. J. Kelkel and C. Surulescu, “On some models for cancer cell migration through tissue networks,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 575--589, 2011.
    9. J. Kelkel and C. Surulescu, “On a stochastic reaction--diffusion system modeling pattern formation  on seashells,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 575--589, 2011.
    10. J. Kelkel, “A Multiscale Approach to Cell Migration in Tissue Networks,” PhD dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2011.
    11. S. Kesselheim, M. Sega, and C. Holm, “Applying ICC* to DNA translocation. Effect of dielectric boundaries,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 33--35, 2011.
    12. R. Klöfkorn, “Benchmark 3D: The Compact Discontinuous Galerkin 2 Scheme,” in Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI Problems & Perspectives, vol. 4, J. Fort, J. Fürst, J. Halama, R. Herbin, and F. Hubert, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 1023–1033.
    13. M. Kohr, C. Pintea, and W. L. Wendland, “Dirichlet-transmission problems for general Brinkman operators  on Lipschitz and $C^1$ domains in Riemannian manifolds,” Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 999--1018, 2011.
    14. O. Kopp et al., “A Classification of BPEL Extensions,” Journal of Systems Integration, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1--26, 2011.
    15. C. Kreuzer and K. G. Siebert, “Decay rates of adaptive finite elements with Dörfler marking,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 679--716, 2011.
    16. C. Kreuzer and K. G. Siebert, “Decay Rates of Adaptive Finite Elements with Dörfler Marking,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 679–716, 2011.
    17. M. Krone, M. Falk, S. Rehm, J. Pleiss, and T. Ertl, “Interactive Exploration of Protein Cavities,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 673--682, 2011.
    18. K. Kuritz, J. D. Kearns, R. Bukhalid, B. D. Harms, U. B. Nielsen, and B. Schoeberl, “Deciphering paradoxical responses to RAF inhibitors - new insights in the MAPK cascade,” in 12th International Conference on Systems Biology, Heidelberg, 2011.
    19. M. Kutter and A.-M. Sändig, “Modeling of ferroelectric hysteresis as variational inequality,” GAMM-Mitteilungen, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 84--89, 2011.
    20. J. Kästner, “Umbrella Sampling,” WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 1, p. 932, 2011.
    21. H. Köroglu and C. W. Scherer, “Scheduled control for robust attenuation of non-stationary sinusoidal disturbances with measurable frequencies,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 504--514, 2011.
  12. L

    1. A. Lalegname and A. Sändig, “Wave-crack interaction in finite elastic bodies,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 131--149, 2011.
    2. A. Lalegname and A.-M. Sändig, “Wave-crack interaction in ?nite elastic bodies,” Bericht 2011/002 des Instituts f�r Angewandte Analysis und Numerische  Simulation der Universität Stuttgart, 2011.
    3. M. Lang, T. Marquez-Lago, J. Stelling, and S. Waldherr, “Autonomous Synchronization of Chemically Coupled Synthetic Oscillators,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 73, pp. 2678--2706, 2011.
    4. A. Lauser, C. Hager, R. Helmig, and B. Wohlmuth, “A new approach for phase transitions in miscible multi-phase flow in porous media,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 0, 2011.
    5. C. Linder, D. Rosato, and C. Miehe, “New finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in electromechanical coupled solids,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 200 (1–4), pp. 141--161, 2011.
  13. M

    1. Maier, “Ein iteratives Gebietszerlegungsverfahren f�r die Reduzierte-Basis-Methode,” 2011.
    2. B. A. Mann, O. Lenz, K. Kremer, and C. Holm, “Hydrogels in Poor Solvent - A Molecular Dynamics Study,” Macromol. Theory Simul., 2011.
    3. J. Meisner, J. B. Rommel, and J. Kästner, “Kinetic Isotope Effects Calculated with the Instanton Method,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 32, no. 16, pp. 3456--3463, 2011.
    4. T. A. Mel’nyk, Iu. A. Nakvasiuk, and W. L. Wendland, “Homogenization of the Signorini boundary-value problem in a thick  junction and boundary integral equations for the homogenized problem,” Math. Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 758--775, 2011.
    5. C. Miehe, B. Kiefer, and D. Rosato, “An incremental variational formulation of dissipative magnetostriction at the macroscopic continuum level,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 1846--1866, 2011.
    6. C. Miehe, I. Frankenreiter, and D. Rosato, “Codf-Evolutions on Polycrystalline Orientation Continua Obtained by Fast Geometric Estimates of Plastic Slip,” International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1103--1139, 2011.
    7. C. Miehe, J. Mendez, S. Göktepe, and L. Schänzel, “Coupled thermoviscoplasticity of glassy polymers in the logarithmic strain space based on the free volume theory,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 1799--1817, 2011.
    8. C. Miehe and D. Rosato, “A rate-dependent incremental variational formulation of ferroelectricity,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 466--496, 2011.
    9. J. Minguez, P. Reimann, and S. Zor, “Event-driven Business Process Management in Engineer-to-Order Supply Chains,” Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2011.
    10. K. Mosthaf et al., “A coupling concept for two-phase compositional porous-medium and  single-phase compositional free flow,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 47, p. W10522, 2011.
    11. D. Mueller-Hoeppe, S. Loehnert, and S. Reese, Recent Developments and Innovative Applications in Computational Mechanics. Springer, 2011.
    12. G. Mückl and C. Dachsbacher, “Deducing Explicit from Implicit Visibility for Global Illumination Using Antiradiance,” Journal of WSCG, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 59--68, 2011.
    13. U. Münz, A. Papachristodoulou, and F. Allgöwer, “Robust consensus controller design for nonlinear relative degree two multi-agent systems with communication constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 145--151, 2011.
  14. N

    1. F. Niedermann, S. Radeschütz, and B. Mitschang, “Business Process Optimization using Formalized Optimization Patterns,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS), 2011.
    2. A. Nowak, F. Leymann, and D. Schumm, “The Differences and Commonalities between Green and Conventional Business Process Management,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, CGC 2011, 2011.
    3. C. Nowakowski, J. Fehr, and P. Eberhard, “Einfluss von Schnittstellenmodellierungen bei der Reduktion elastischer Mehrkörpersysteme,” at - Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 59, pp. 512--519, 2011.
  15. O

    1. J. Offtermatt and N. Radde, “Convergence of Posteriors for Structurally Non-Identifiable Problems Using Results from the Theory of Inverse Problems,” Journal of Inverse and Illposed Problems, 2011.
    2. S. Oladyshkin and M. Panfilov, “Hydrogen penetration in water through porous medium: application to a radioactive waste storage site,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 989--999, 2011.
    3. S. Oladyshkin, H. Class, R. Helmig, and W. Nowak, “An Integrative Approach to Robust Design and Probabilistic Risk Assessment for CO2 Storage in Geological Formations,” Computational Geosciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 565--577, 2011.
  16. P

    1. K. A. Peterson, C. Krause, H. Stoll, J. G. Hill, and H.-J. Werner, “Application of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster methods to molecules containing post-3d main group elements,” Mol. Phys., vol. 109, no. 22, 2011.
    2. B. Pfleging, A. Schmidt, T. Döring, and M. Knobel, “AutoNUI: a workshop on automotive natural user interfaces,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 207--209, 2011.
    3. B. Pfleging, M. Kienast, A. Schmidt, and T. Döring, “SpeeT: A Multimodal Interaction Style Combining Speech  and Touch Interaction in Automotive Environments,” Adjunct Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2011.
    4. D. Philipp, F. Dürr, and K. Rothermel, “A Sensor Network Abstraction for Flexible Public Sensing Systems,” Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems: MASS11, 2011.
    5. U. Pompe, Perception and Cognition - The Analysis of Object Recognition, vol. 0. Mentis Verlag, 2011.
  17. Q

    1. B. Qiao, J. J. Cerda, and C. Holm, “Atomistic Study of Surface Effects on Polyelectrolyte Adsorption: Case Study of a Poly(styrenesulfonate) Monolayer,” Macromolecules, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1707--1718, 2011.
    2. B. Qiao, M. Sega, and C. Holm, “An atomistic study of a poly(styrene sulfonate)/poly(diallyldimethylammonium) bilayer: the role of surface properties and charge reversal,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 13, no. 36, pp. 16336–16342, 2011.
  18. R

    1. N. Radde, “The role of feedback mechanisms in biological network models - A tutorial,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1--14, 2011.
    2. M. Reble, M. A. Müller, and F. Allgöwer, “Unconstrained Model Predictive Control and Suboptimality Estimates for Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems,” 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pp. 7599--7604, 2011.
    3. M. Reble and F. Allgöwer, “Unconstrained Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Suboptimality Estimates for Continuous-Time Systems,” Proc.  18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 6733--6738, 2011.
    4. M. Reble, D. E. Quevedo, and F. Allgöwer, “Stochastic Stability and Performance Estimates of Packetized Unconstrained Model Predictive Control for Networked Control Systems,” 9th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation, pp. 171--176, 2011.
    5. M. Reble, F. D. Brunner, and F. Allgöwer, “Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems without Terminal Constraint,” Proc.  18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 9254--9259, 2011.
    6. P. Reimann, H. Schwarz, and B. Mitschang, “Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Tight Integration of Database and Workflow Engines,” Journal of Information and Data Management, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 353--368, 2011.
    7. P. Reimann, M. Reiter, H. Schwarz, D. Karastoyanova, and F. Leymann, “SIMPL - A Framework for Accessing External Data in Simulation Workflows,” 14. GI-Fachtagung Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web (BTW), vol. 0, 2011.
    8. T. Reiner, G. Mückl, and C. Dachsbacher, “Interactive Modeling of Implicit Surfaces using a Direct Visualization Approach with Signed Distance Functions,” Computers & Graphics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 596--603, 2011.
    9. H.-U. Rempler, C. Wieners, and W. Ehlers, “Efficiency Comparison of an Augmented Finite Element Formulation with Standard Return Mapping Algorithms for Elastic-inelastic Materials,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 0, 2011.
    10. O. Renn, A. Klinke, and M. van Asselt, “Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis,” AMBIO: A JOURNAL OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 231--246, 2011.
    11. O. Renn, A. Arnold, V. Schetula, and P.-J. Schweizer, “Das Ringen der Sozialwissenschaften um ihre Rolle in der Klimawandeldebatte,” Soziologische Revue, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 463--472, 2011.
    12. O. Renn, “Neue Technologien, neue Technikfolgen: Ambivalenz, Komplexität und Unsicherheit als Herausforderungen der Technikfolgenabschätzung,” Neue Technologien in der Gesellschaft Akteure, Erwartungen, Kontroversen und Konjunkturen, vol. 0, pp. 63--76, 2011.
    13. M. Richter, “Virtual reality - virtual actuality. Remarks on the use of technical terms in philosophy of virtuality,” Trust and Virtual Worlds: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 31--44, 2011.
    14. Th. Richter et al., “ViPLab - A Virtual Programming Laboratory for Mathematics and Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, Washington, DC, USA, 2011, pp. 537--542.
    15. J. B. Rommel and J. Kästner, “The Fragmentation?Recombination Mechanism of the Enzyme Glutamate Mutase Studied by QM/MM Simulations,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 26, p. 10195, 2011.
    16. J. B. Rommel and J. Kästner, “Adaptive Integration Grids in Instanton Theory Improve the Numerical Accuracy at Low Temperature,” J. Chem. Phys, vol. 134, no. 18, p. 184107, 2011.
    17. T. Ruiner, “A-posteriori Fehlersch�tzer f�r Reduzierte Mechanische Systeme zweiter  Ordnung,” 2011.
    18. T. K. Rupp and S. Schmitt, “Inverse dynamics of the lower extremities: novel approach considering talocrural and subtalar joint axis,” Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 11, pp. 515--527, 2011.
    19. O. Röhrle, H. Köstler, and M. Loch, “Segmentation of skeletal muscle fibres for applications in computational skeletal muscle mechanics,” Computational Biomechanics for Medicine, vol. 0, pp. 107--117, 2011.
    20. O. Röhrle, E. Ramasamy, and S. Schmitt, “Forward dynamics applied to a three-dimensional continuum-mechanical model of the upper limb,” Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 11, pp. 115--116, 2011.
    21. A. Rössle and A.-M. Sändig, “Corner Singularities and Regularity Results for the Reissner/Mindlin  Plate Model,” Journal of Elasticity, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 113--135, 2011.
  19. S

    1. P. A. Sanchez, J. J. Cerda, V. Ballenegger, T. Sintes, O. Piro, and C. Holm, “Semiflexible magnetic filaments near attractive flat surfaces: a Langevin dynamics study,” Soft Matter, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1809--1818, 2011.
    2. G. Santin, A. Sommariva, and M. Vianello, “An algebraic cubature formula on curvilinear polygons,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 24, pp. 10003--10015, 2011.
    3. C. Schacht, T. Vlugt, and J. Gross, “Using an analytic equation of state quantitative solubilities of  CO2 by molecular simulation,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 393--396, 2011.
    4. M. Schenke and W. Ehlers, “On the Analysis of Soils using an Abaqus-PANDAS Interface,” Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 431--432, 2011.
    5. C. W. Scherer and I. E. Köse, On Convergence of Transfer Matrices and Their Realizations, vol. 18. IFAC, 2011.
    6. O. Schiller, B. Schiller, A. Brodt, and B. Mitschang, “Native support of multi-tenancy in RDBMS for software as a service,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, vol. 0, pp. 117--128, 2011.
    7. D. Schittler, J. Hasenauer, and F. Allgöwer, “A generalized population model for cell proliferation: Integrating division numbers and label dynamics,” Proc. of the 8th Workshop on Comp. Syst. Biol., vol. 0, pp. 165--168, 2011.
    8. D. Schleicher et al., “Compliance Domains: A Means to Model Data-Restrictions in Cloud Environments,” Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2011), 2011.
    9. S. Schmauder and C. Kohler, “Atomistic simulations of solid solution strengthening of α-Iron,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1238--1243, 2011.
    10. A. Schmidt, M. Langheinrich, and K. Kersting, “Perception beyond the Here and Now,” Computer, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 86--89, 2011.
    11. S. Schneegass, B. Pfleging, D. Kern, and A. Schmidt, “Support for Modeling Interaction with Automotive User Interfaces,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2011.
    12. B. Schneider, G. A. D Addetta, and E. Ramm, “On Material Modeling by Polygonal Discrete Elements,” Particle-Based Methods, vol. 25, pp. 159--185, 2011.
    13. G. Schneider and C. E. Wayne, “Justification of the NLS approximation for a quasilinear water wave model,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 238--269, 2011.
    14. D. Schumm, D. Karastoyanova, O. Kopp, F. Leymann, M. Sonntag, and S. Strauch, “Process Fragment Libraries for Easier and Faster Development of Process-based Applications,” SI-Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.
    15. D. Schumm, G. Latuske, F. Leymann, R. Mietzner, and T. Scheibler, State Propagation for Business Process Monitoring on Different Levels of Abstraction, vol. 0. AIS Electronic Library, 2011.
    16. D. Schuster, “SVD-basierte Modellreduktion f�r Elastische Mehrk�rpersysteme,” 2011.
    17. M. Schweitzer, “Generalizations of the Finite Element Method,” Central European Journal of Mathematics, vol. 0, 2011.
    18. M. A. Schweitzer, “Multilevel particle-partition of unity method,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 307--328, 2011.
    19. M. A. Schweitzer, “Stable enrichment and local preconditioning in the particle-partition of unity method,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 137--170, 2011.
    20. J. Seifert, B. Pfleging, E. d. C Valderrama Bahamóndez, M. Hermes, E. Rukzio, and A. Schmidt, “MobiDev: A Tool for Creating Apps on Mobile Phones,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 109--112, 2011.
    21. P. Sekler, M. Voß, and A. Verl, “Model-based calculation of the system behavior of machine structures on the control device for vibration avoidance,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 0, 2011.
    22. K. R. Shamasundar, G. Knizia, and H.-J. Werner, “A new internally contracted multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI) method,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 135, no. 5, p. 054101, 2011.
    23. T. Shiozaki, W. Gyorffy, P. Celani, and H.-J. Werner, “Communication: Extended multi-state complete active space second-order perturbation theory: Energy and nuclear gradients,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 135, p. 081106, 2011.
    24. T. Shiozaki and H.-J. Werner, “Explicitly correlated multireference configuration interaction with multiple reference functions: Avoided crossings and conical intersections,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 134, p. 184104, 2011.
    25. K. G. Siebert, “A Convergence Proof for Adaptive Finite Elements without Lower Bound,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 947–970, 2011.
    26. M. Sonntag and D. Karastoyanova, “Concurrent Workflow Evolution,” Electronic Communications of the EASST, vol. 37, p. 12, 2011.
    27. M. Sonntag, S. Hotta, D. Karastoyanova, D. Molnar, and S. Schmauder, Workflow-Based Distributed Environment For Legacy Simulation Applications, vol. 0. SciTePress Digital Library, 2011.
    28. M. Sonntag, S. Hotta, D. Karastoyanova, D. Molnar, and S. Schmauder, “Using Services and Service Compositions to Enable the Distributed Execution of Legacy Simulation Applications,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6994, pp. 242--253, 2011.
    29. I. Steinwart, D. Hush, and C. Scovel, “Training SVMs without offset,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 141--202, 2011.
    30. C. Surulescu and N. Surulescu, “Modeling and simulation of bacterial motion via a nonparametric method,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 263--277, 2011.
  20. T

    1. Q. Tang and P. Eberhard, “A PSO-based Algorithm Designed for a Swarm of Mobile Robots,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 0, 2011.
    2. M. A. Tariq, B. Koldehofe, G. G. Koch, I. Khan, and K. Rothermel, “Meeting subscriber-defined QoS constraints in publish/subscribe systems,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 0, 2011.
  21. V

    1. J. Veenman and C. W. Scherer, Robust Gain-Scheduled Estimation: A Convex Solution, vol. 0. 49th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 2011.
    2. J. Veenman and C. W. Scherer, IQC-Synthesis with General Dynamic Multipliers, vol. 18. 18th IFAC World Congress, 2011.
  22. W

    1. A. Wagner and W. Ehlers, “Computational modelling of drug infusion into the anisotropic white-matter tracts of the human brain,” Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 133--134, 2011.
    2. S. Waldherr, D. Dylus, and F. Allgöwer, “Bifurcation search via feedback loop breaking in biochemical signaling pathways with time delay,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 13, pp. 691--700, 2011.
    3. S. Waldherr and F. Allgöwer, “Robust stability and instability of biochemical networks with parametric uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1139--1146, 2011.
    4. L. Walter, S. Oladyshkin, H. Class, M. Darcis, and R. Helmig, “A study on pressure evolution in a channel system during CO2 injection,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 3722--3729, 2011.
    5. M. Weidmann, F. Koetter, T. Renner, D. Schumm, F. Leymann, and D. Schleicher, “Synchronization of Adaptive Process Models Using Levels of Abstraction,” Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Evolutionary Business Processes (EVL-BP 2011), 2011.
    6. M. Weidmann, M. Alvi, F. Koetter, F. Leymann, T. Renner, and D. Schumm, “Business Process Change Management based on Process Model Synchronization of Multiple Abstraction Levels,” Proceedings of SOCA, 2011.
    7. W. Weimer-Jehle and H. Kosow, “Gesellschaftliche Kontextszenarien als Ausgangspunkt für modellgestützte Energieszenarien,” C. Diekhoff  et al. (Hrsg.): Energieszenarien. Konstruktion, Bewertung und Wirkung, vol. 0, pp. 53--65, 2011.
    8. W. Weimer-Jehle, S. Wassermann, and H. Kosow, “Konsistente Rahmendaten für Modellierungen und Szenariobildung im UBA,” UBA Texte, vol. 20, 2011.
    9. W. L. Wendland, “Boundary element domain decomposition with Trefftz elements and Levi  fuctions,” in 19th Intern. Conf. on Computer Methods in Mechanics, Warsaw, 2011.
    10. K. Wendler, F. Dommert, Y. Y. Zhao, R. Berger, C. Holm, and L. Delle Site, “Ionic liquids studied across different scales: A computational perspective,” Faraday Discussions, vol. 0, 2011.
    11. N. Wengert and P. Eberhard, “Optimization of the Dynamical Behavior of High-Performance Lens Systems to Reduce Dynamic Aberrations,” Archive of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 58, pp. 407--423, 2011.
    12. H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, and M. Schütz, “Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chemistry program package,” Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 0, 2011.
    13. H.-J. Werner and M. Schütz, “An efficienient local coupled cluster method for accurate thermochemistry of large systems,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 135, p. 144116, 2011.
    14. P. Wieland, R. Sepulchre, and F. Allgöwer, “An internal model principle is necessary and sufficient for linear output synchronization,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1068--1074, 2011.
    15. C. Winkel, S. Neumann, C. Surulescu, and P. Scheurich, “A minimal mathematical model for the initial molecular interactions  of death receptor signalling,” SRC SimTech, 2011.
  23. Z

    1. O. Zeeb, “Reduzierte Basis Modelle f�r Formoptimierung unter Verwendung des  SQP-Algorithmus,” 2011.
    2. S. Zinatbakhsh, B. Markert, and W. Ehlers, “On the Stability Analysis of Decoupled Solution Schemes,” Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 11, pp. 497--498, 2011.
Zum Seitenanfang