Electrokinetic characterization of conducting two-phase flows in model porous media

PN 3-3 (II)

Project description

In the past decades computational models have become increasingly more important, because they can give microscopic insights into systems that are inaccessible experimentally. Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)  is one of the several existing models to simulate fluid flow in porous geometries, and it is a key model in this project.

Modeling real world applications is typically more cumbersome than describing the flow of simple fluids, since they often involve the presence of multiple fluid phases or electrolyte solutions. Within LBM, there exists several extensions for including a multiphase flow description, but the coupling with an electrolyte, typically governed by the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equation, is still a challenging task.

In this project, we want to bridge the gap beetween particle based simulations and continuum methods by developing a easily extendable, predictive electrokinetic multiphase flow model for complex geometries.  For this purpose, special interest is devoted to engineer a wetting model, which would allow us to study the influence of surface effects on the electrolytic multiphase flow characteristics in porous media.

In addition to that, we are also interested in developing a direct coupling between the electrokinetics model and charged polymers. This would allow to use both descriptions, the particle based and the continuum model, in the same simulation and thus open up the possibility to efficiently perform simulation studies in the field of electrokinetic drug release with nanogels or the study of protein dynamics in electrolyte solutions in varying pH conditions.

Furthermore, we will try to apply machine learning techniques to speed up our simulations with feature extractions or attempt to fully replace the simulation by predicting transport properties based on geometry data.

Project information

Project title Electrokinetic characterization of conducting two-phase flows in model porous media
Project leaders Christian Holm (Holger Steeb)
Project staff David Beyer, doctoral researcher
Project partners

Nikolaos Karadimitriou
Joachim Groß
Alexander Schlaich
Rudolf Weeber

Project duration September 2022 - December 2025
Project number PN 3-3 (II)

Publications PN 3-3 and PN 3-3 (II)

  1. 2023

    1. C. Lohrmann and C. Holm, “Optimal motility strategies for self-propelled agents to explore porous media,” Physical Review B, vol. 108, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.054401.
    2. C. Lohrmann and C. Holm, “A novel model for biofilm initiation in porous media flow,” Soft Matter, vol. 19, no. 36, Art. no. 36, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D3SM00575E.
  2. 2022

    1. I. Tischler, F. Weik, R. Kaufmann, M. Kuron, R. Weeber, and C. Holm, “A thermalized electrokinetics model including stochastic reactions suitable for multiscale simulations of reaction-advection-diffusion systems,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 63, p. 101770, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101770.
  3. 2021

    1. J. Zeman, S. Kondrat, and C. Holm, “Ionic screening in bulk and under confinement,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 155, no. 20, Art. no. 20, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0069340.
    2. A. Wagner et al., “Permeability Estimation of Regular Porous Structures: A Benchmark for Comparison of Methods,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 138, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11242-021-01586-2.
    3. K. Szuttor, P. Kreissl, and C. Holm, “A numerical investigation of analyte size effects in nanopore sensing systems,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 155, no. 13, Art. no. 13, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0065085.
    4. K. Szuttor, F. Weik, J.-N. Grad, and C. Holm, “Modeling the current modulation of bundled DNA structures in nanopores,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 154, no. 5, Art. no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0038530.
    5. J. M. Riede, C. Holm, S. Schmitt, and D. F. B. Haeufle, “The control effort to steer self-propelled microswimmers depends on their morphology: comparing symmetric spherical versus asymmetric              L              -shaped particles,” Royal Society Open Science, vol. 8, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1098/rsos.201839.
    6. M. Kuron, C. Stewart, J. de Graaf, and C. Holm, “An extensible lattice Boltzmann method for viscoelastic flows: complex and moving boundaries in Oldroyd-B fluids,” The European Physical Journal E, vol. 44, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1140/epje/s10189-020-00005-6.
  4. 2020

    1. S. Tovey et al., “DFT accurate interatomic potential for molten NaCl from machine learning,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 124, no. 47, Art. no. 47, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08870.
    2. J. Zeman, S. Kondrat, and C. Holm, “Bulk ionic screening lengths from extremely large-scale molecular dynamics simulations,” Chemical Communications, vol. 56, no. 100, Art. no. 100, 2020, doi: 10.1039/D0CC05023G.
    3. G. Sivaraman et al., “Machine-learned interatomic potentials by active learning: amorphous and liquid hafnium dioxide,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-00367-7.
    4. K. Breitsprecher et al., “How to speed up ion transport in nanopores,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19903-6.
  5. 2019

    1. J. Zeman, C. Holm, and J. Smiatek, “The Effect of Small Organic Cosolutes on Water Structure and Dynamics,” Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, vol. 65, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00577.
To the top of the page