Around ten percent of the Earth’s continental surface is covered by karst rock, especially limestone and dolomite, which is naturally permeable and easily soluble. These rocks are interlaced with many cracks, fissures, and crevices caused by mechanical stress such as the uplift of entire mountains. When it rains, the water seeps into the ground, where it mixes with CO2 produced by soil bacteria during the decomposition of plant matter. This CO2 converts the rainwater into carbonic acid, which attacks the limestone and slowly dissolves it, especially along the existing cracks and fissures. Water moves primarily along these cavities, which, over time, become increasingly larger and connect to form entire cave systems.
During karstification, a natural process in which rock is broken down by chemical decomposition, CO2 slowly dissolves the limestone, thereby creating new cavities.
Caves can form underground over thousands of years; these are initially filled with water. If the karst mountains are lifted, the karst water level shifts to greater depths, and the cavities above dry out. Depending on the CO2 content in the cave, the dripping water forms unusual stalagmites and stalactites. “However, if the cave climate and the CO2 concentration in the cavity change, the dripping water absorbs CO2 again. As a result, the limescale dissolves, and the previously deposited stalactites are dissolved,” explains Leon Keim. As part of his doctoral studies within a SimTech project, he is investigating how CO2 behaves in the cave and how it exchanges with the atmosphere and water in the karst rock. The measurements take place in the Laichingen Deep Cave in the Swabian Alb. The data he obtains forms the basis for simulation models.
The vadose zone lies between the soil surface and the groundwater zone, the phreatic zone. The vadose zone is only temporarily saturated with water (e.g., after precipitation) while the phreatic zone is permanently saturated.
Influences on the CO2 in the karst system
The CO2 content in the Laichingen Deep Cave depends on several factors and processes. One of these is the thickness of the soil layer above the cave. It is relatively thin and can therefore enable gas exchange between the cave air and the atmosphere in dry conditions. If the soil or rock layer is saturated with water after considerable precipitation, this layer acts as a barrier to gases. However, when dissolved in water, gas can still reach the subsurface, the vadose zone. On the other hand, seasons, temperature, and air currents (ventilation) in the cave also influence the CO2 content and its migration through the limestone mountains.
The cave air has an average temperature of 8–9°C both in summer and winter. In summer, the air outside is usually warmer than in the cave; in winter, it is usually colder. Gas becomes heavier the colder it is and the more CO2 it contains. If the soil dries out, the gas presses into the cave. Depending on the temperature, it can then escape back into the atmosphere through the soil layer.
If the CO2 is dissolved in water, it increases its density. The water thus becomes heavier and accumulates at the interface between the vadose and phreatic zones (i.e., at the boundary layer to the groundwater). There, it continues to move downwards. This leads to fingering, the formation of finger-like structures of CO2-enriched water in the groundwater. Because of these fingers, the CO2 can increasingly enter the groundwater. “However, there is a lack of reliable data on these processes under karst conditions,” says Keim. Finding this out is the focus of his doctoral project.
Research inspired by cave and local history association
The idea came from geologist Harald Scherzer from the Laichingen Cave and Heritage Association. He suspected fluctuating CO2 levels in the cave, wanted to find out more, and contacted Keim’s doctoral supervisor, Professor Holger Class. Because the results are interesting not only for cave research but also for climate modelers or CO2 storage in the soil, a research project was created from this. In order to measure the CO2 content, a measuring station over 6 m high was transported to the Laichingen Deep Cave and set up.
It consisted of a water column, which was essentially a six-meter-long pipe filled with tap water. They imitated a cave lake to measure gas exchange with the water. Sensors were attached inside the pipe at depths of 0.15 and 5.6 m in order to measure the CO2 content of the water. Sensors were installed above the pipe to measure the CO2 content of the cave air. The data provides information on how the CO2 concentration in the water changes at different depths depending on the CO2 concentration in the air. From this, it is then possible to deduce the conditions and time periods under which the fingers occur.
CO2 concentration in the air depends on temperature and precipitation
Keim can analyze the recorded data in his office at the University of Stuttgart because it is transmitted online. In addition, the temperature in the cave was measured and freely accessible data on the daily amount of precipitation as well as the minimum, maximum, and average daily temperature from the German Weather Service was used and linked to the measurement data. The measurements in the Laichingen Deep Cave began in April 2021 and are still ongoing. “We started by describing what we had observed,” says Keim. “For example, we have seen that every spring, the CO2 concentration tends to be rather low and increases over the summer. In the summer of 2021, we had a particularly high CO2 concentration, which was not the case in the following two years and was then quite high again in 2024. So we naturally asked ourselves: why is that?”
CO2 values in the Laichingen Deep Cave
A lower CO2 concentration was generally measured in the winter months through to early summer (i.e., in dry and cold periods) than in summer and fall. Peak CO2 concentrations were also reached in the cave air during periods of high precipitation. Because the temperature outside was lower than inside the cave in winter, the air outside was heavier and forced its way inside.
If the upper soil layer dried out, gas exchange between the cave and atmospheric air took place, and the CO2 concentration decreased. In summer, the CO2 concentration tended to be higher. The scientists interpreted the particularly sharp increase in concentrations in late summer and early fall 2021 as the result of a relatively wet summer followed by an extremely dry period. In periods of high precipitation and when the CO2 was stored in the karst system for a while, the concentration leveled off at 15,000 ppm. This equilibrium value repeatedly occurred in the cave air.
Mobility of CO2 gas in the karst system

The question was also whether the increased visitor traffic in summer (the Laichingen Deep Cave is a show cave from April to October) also increases the CO2 concentration. Daily fluctuations confirmed this pattern, but the variations in the measurement curves were minor and therefore negligible over the course of the year. Scientists found the events around March 5, 2023 particularly striking. On that day, the Baden-Wuerttemberg Cave Rescue Service conducted a major exercise, during which active ventilation was installed down to the measuring station in a neighboring shaft. This greatly reduced the CO2 concentration. This data could still be relevant for further university studies.
CO2 trapped in the water
The scientists also made some surprising observations when measuring the gas exchange with the water. Class and his colleagues documented the results in 2023. They found that the same fluctuations in concentration occurred at shallow water depths as in the cave air, albeit not as strongly. When CO2 is dissolved in water, it increases its density and sinks to the bottom. However, at a depth of 1 m, the smallest disturbances (e.g., minimal temperature differences or small vibrations) are still sufficient for the CO2 to return to the gas phase (i.e., back into the cave air).
However, at greater water depths, the CO2 concentration was high. A peak value was reached at a depth of 5.85 m. Once CO2 had sunk, it was trapped there (i.e., it did not rise again). Large water depths are therefore a highly efficient and permanent trap for CO2 provided there is no considerable mixing. “To our knowledge, this is the first time that the mobility of CO2 in still water has been modeled in a cave,” says Keim. The data sets are freely available to other scientists and modelers for their own research.
More caves in focus
In order to find out whether the results from the Laichingen Deep Cave can also be transferred to other caves, the scientists led by Class started another project with CO2 measurements in the Postojna Cave in Slovenia. Together with Slovenian scientists from the Karst Research Institute in Postojna, they are investigating how CO2 behaves in the vadose zone under changing conditions such as shifting air currents within the cave. The Slovenian scientists have already delivered important results here; however in one part of the cave, a distribution of CO2 that cannot yet be explained was found. Simulations should help to uncover the processes.
World Cultural Heritage in danger
In the world-famous Lascaux Cave in the Dordogne in France, the wall paintings of which are a UNESCO World Heritage Site, there is an additional problem: Because of climate change, a fungus is spreading there and threatening the unique works of art, some of which are up to 21,000 years old.
In collaboration with researchers from the University of Bordeaux, scientists from the University of Stuttgart also aim to investigate how CO2 moves through the cave. In doing so, they can build on the preliminary work of the French scientists. “Ultimately, we aim to better understand which processes lead to which effects in caves and how climate change affects them,” explains Keim.
Manuela Mild | SimTech Science Communication
Read more
Keim, L., & Class, H. (2025). Rayleigh invariance allows the estimation of effective CO2 fluxes due to convective dissolution into water-filled fractures. Water Resources Research, 61, e2024WR037778. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037778
Laichinger Höhlenfreund, 59. Jahrgang, S. 35-50, 18 Abb.: Laichingen 2024
Class, H.; Keim, L.; Schirmer, L.; Strauch, B.; Wendel, K.; Zimmer, M. Seasonal Dynamics of Gaseous CO2 Concentrations in a Karst Cave Correspond with Aqueous Concentrations in a Stagnant Water Column. Geosciences 2023, 13, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020051
Keim, L., Class, H., Schirmer, L., Wendel, K., Strauch, B., & Zimmer, M. (2023). Data for: Measurement Campaign of Gaseous CO2 Concentrations in a Karst Cave with Aqueous Concentrations in a Stagnant Water Column 2021-2022. https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-3271
Keim, L., Class, H., Schirmer, L., Strauch, B., Wendel, K., & Zimmer, M. (2023). Code for: Seasonal Dynamics of Gaseous CO2 Concentrations in a Karst Cave Correspond With Aqueous Concentrations in a Stagnant Water Column. DaRUS. https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-3276
About the scientists
Holger Class is Professor and Acting Head of the Department of Hydromechanics and Modeling of Hydrosystems at the Institute for Modeling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems at the University of Stuttgart. His research focuses on the development of model concepts for flow and transport processes in the subsurface with various applications such as gas storage and precipitation processes in pore space. He conducted research at SimTech in project PN1-4 (I and II) and PN1-14 and works in the SFB 1313 in project C04. Because he lives in the Swabian Alb, he has been studying the processes of CO2 in caves for many years.
Leon Keim is a research associate in the Department of Hydromechanics and Modeling of Hydrosystems and is pursuing a PhD within the SimTech project PN1-14. His interest in flow processes was awakened early on by everyday observations—from air resistance when cycling to the turbulence when milk spreads in coffee. As a keen mountaineer, he was able to observe similar phenomena on a larger scale in the Alps: how air masses flow over mountains and form clouds and how sun-warmed air rises and creates thermals because of density differences. During his tours, he noticed that changes in the environment such as dwindling glaciers and increasing extreme weather conditions made climate change particularly visible there. This mixture of interest in currents and environmental awareness led him to study civil engineering at the University of Stuttgart. His doctoral degree studies will allow him to deepen his knowledge and research into fluid mechanical flow processes.